Bibliography

Allen and Perrault1980

James F. Allen and C. R. Perrault.
1980.
Analyzing intention in dialogues.
Artificial Intelligence, 15(3):143-178.

Allen
2#2
2001

James F. Allen, George Ferguson, and Amanda Stent.
2001.
An architecture for more realistic conversational systems.
In Proceedings of Intelligent User Interfaces 2001 (IUI-01), Santa Fe, NM, January.

Ashley
2#2
2002

K. Ashley, Ravi Desai, and John M. Levine.
2002.
Teaching case-based argumentation concepts using dialectic arguments vs. didactic explanations.
In ITS-2002 [ITS2002], pages 585-595.
http://link.springer.de/link/service/series/0558/bibs/2363/23630585.htm.

Ass2003

Association for Computational Linguistics.
2003.
Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL), Budapest, Hungary, April 12-17.

Auer
2#2
2002

Eric Auer, Claudia Crispi, Christian Dressler, Cordula Klein, Klöckner Kerstin, Norbert Pfleger, and Diana Raileanu.
2002.
Sprachsteuerung im Aufzug.
Computational Linguistics, Saarland University.

Blaylock
2#2
2003

Nate Blaylock, James Allen, and George Ferguson.
2003.
Managing communicative intentions with collaborative problem solving.
In Ronnie Smith and Jan van Kuppevelt, editors, Current and New Directions in Discourse and Dialogue. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

Cassell
2#2
1998

Justine Cassell, Obed E. Torres, and Scott Prevost.
1998.
Turn taking vs. discourse structure: how best to model multimodal conversation.
In Machine Conversations. Kluwer, The Hague.
http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/cassell98turn.html.

Cassell2000

Justine Cassell.
2000.
More than just another pretty face: Embodied conversational interface agents.
Communications of ACM, 43(4):70-78.
http://gn.www.media.mit.edu/groups/gn/publications/CACM.pdf.

Cassell2001

Justine Cassell.
2001.
Embodied conversational agents: Representation and intelligence in user interfaces.
AI Magazine, 22(3):67-83.

Chu-Carroll and Brown1997

Jennifer Chu-Carroll and Michael K. Brown.
1997.
An evidential model for tracking initiative in collaborative dialogue interactions.
Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 262-270.

Chu-Carroll and Carberry2000

Jennifer Chu-Carroll and Sandra Carberry.
2000.
Conflict resolution in collaborative planning dialogues.
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53(6):969-1015.

Chu-Carroll2000a

J. Chu-Carroll.
2000a.
Mimic:an adaptive mixed initiative spoken dialogue system for information queries.
In Proceedings of the 6th Association for Computer Linguistics Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, pages 97-104.

Chu-Carroll2000b

J.S. Chu-Carroll, J.and Nickerson.
2000b.
Evaluating automatic dialogue strategy adaptation for a spoken dialogue system.
In Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the North American Chapter of the Associations for Computational Linguistics, pages 202-209.

Consortium2001

The Trindi Consortium.
2001.
The trindi book.
http://www.ling.gu.se/projekt/trindi//book.ps, May.

Cooper and Larsson2003

Robin Cooper and Staffan Larsson.
2003.
Accommodation and reaccommodation in dialogue.
In Bäuerle, Uwe Reyle, and Ede Zimmerman, editors, Presuppositions and Discourse. Elsevier.
http://www.ling.gu.se/~cooper/papers/kampfest-paper.ps.

Core
2#2
2000a

Mark G. Core, Johanna Moore, and Claus Zinn.
2000a.
Supporting constructive learning with a feedback planner.
Technical Report of American Association for Atficial Intelligence,Papers from Symposium on Building Dialogue Systems for Tutorial Applications FS-00-01, Human Communication Research Center,University of Edinburgh, 445 Burgess Drive,Menlo Park CA 94025.

Core
2#2
2000b

Mark G. Core, Johanna D. Moore, Claus Zinn, and Peter Wiemer-Hastings.
2000b.
Modeling human teaching tactics in a computer tutor.
In Proceedings of the ITS 2000 Workshop on Modelling Human Teaching Tactics and Strategies.

Core
2#2
2001

Mark G. Core, Johanna D. Moore, and Claus W. Zinn.
2001.
Initiative magement for tutorial dialogues.
In Proceedings of the NAACL-2001 Workshop on Adaptation in Dialogue System, Pittsburgh, PA, June.

Core
2#2
2003

Mark G. Core, Johanna D. Moore, and Claus W. Zinn.
2003.
The role of initiative in tutorial dialogue.
In Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL) [Ass2003].
http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/E/E03/E03-1072.pdf.

Duncan1972

S. Jr. Duncan.
1972.
Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23(2):283-292.

Duncan1974

S. Jr. Duncan.
1974.
On the structure of speaker-auditor interaction during speaking turns.
Language in Society, 3(2):161-180.

Ericsson
2#2
2000

Stina Ericsson, Ian Lewin, C.J. Rupp, and Robin Cooper.
2000.
Dialogue moves in negotiative dialogues.
Technical Report 1.2, Siridus Project Administrator SRI Internationa, 23 Millers Yard,Mill Lane,Cambridge,United Kingdom CB2 IRQ, September.

Fernandéz and Ginzburg2003

Raquel Fernandéz and Jonathan Ginzburg.
2003.
A corpus study of non-sentential utterances in dialogue.
Traitement Automatique des Langues (TAL), 43(8).
http://www.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/staff/ginzburg/nsu-pap.pdf or http://www.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/staff/raquel/Publications/files/NSU-TAL.ps.

Fernandéz
2#2
2003

Raquel Fernandéz, Jonathan Ginzburg, Howard Gregory, and Shalom Lappin.
2003.
SHARDS: Fragment resolution in dialogue.
In Harry Bunt and Reinhard Muskens, editors, Computing Meaning, volume 3. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
http://www.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/staff/lappin/papers/shards_chap.ps.

Ginzburg1996

Jonathan Ginzburg.
1996.
Interrogatives: Questions, facts and dialogue.
In Shalom Lappin, editor, The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, chapter Chapter 15, pages 385-422. Blackwell Publishers.

Grosz and Kraus1996

Barbara J. Grosz and Sarit Kraus.
1996.
Collaborative plans for complex group action.
Artificial Intelligence, 86(2):269-357.

Grosz and Sidner1986

Barbara Grosz and Candy L. Sidner.
1986.
Attention, intentions and the structure of discourse.
Computational linguistics, 12:175-204.

Hirschberg
2#2
2001

Julia Hirschberg, Mark Swerts, and Diane Litman.
2001.
Labeling corrections and aware sites in spoken dialogue systems.
In Proceedings of the SIG-Dial Workshop.
http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/W/W01/W01-1610.pdf.

Hockey
2#2
2003

Beth Ann Hockey, Oliver Lemon, Ellen Campana, Laura Hiatt, Gregory Aist, James Hieronymus, Alexander Gruensetin, and John Dowding.
2003.
Targeted help for spoken dialogue systems: intelligent feedback improves naive users' performance.
In Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL) [Ass2003], pages 147-154.
http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/E/E03/E03-1075.pdf.

ITS2002

2002.
Proceedings of the 6th Int. Conf. Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Springer.

Jurafsky and Martin2000

Daniel Jurafsky and James H. Martin.
2000.
Speech and language processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition.
Prentice Hall Series in Artificial Intelligence. Prentice Hall.
http://www.cs.colorado.edu/~martin/slp.html.

Koit and Oim2000

Mare Koit and H. Oim.
2000.
Dialogue management in the agreement negotiation process: A model that involves natural reasoning.
In Proceedings of the 1st SIGdial workshop. ACL.
http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/W/W00/W00-1012.pdf.

Kruijff-Korbayová and Kosny2003

Ivana Kruijff-Korbayová and Claudia Kosny, editors.
2003.
Proceedings of the 7th workshop on the semantics and pragmatics of dialogue (DiaBruck). Computational Linguistics, Saarland University, September 4-6.

Larsson and Traum2000

Staffan Larsson and David R. Traum.
2000.
Information state and dialogue management in the trindi dialogue move engine toolkit.
Natural Language Engineering, 6(3-4):323-340.
http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/344294.html or http://www.ling.gu.se/~sl/nle.ps.

Larsson2002a

Staffan Larsson.
2002a.
Issue-based Dialogue Management.
Ph.d. thesis, Göteborg University.

Larsson2002b

Staffan Larsson.
2002b.
Issues under negotiation.
In Jokinen and Mc Roy, editors, Proceedings of the Third SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, pages 103-112.
http://www.ling.gu.se/~sl/Papers/sigdial2002.ps.

Larsson2003

Staffan Larsson.
2003.
Interactive communication management in an issue-based dialogue system.
In Kruijff-Korbayová and Kosny [Kruijff-Korbayová and Kosny2003], pages 75-82.
https://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/diabruck/submission_finals/papers/104/paper_104.ps.

Lemon
2#2
2002

Oliver Lemon, Alexander Gruenstein, and Stanley Peters.
2002.
Collaborative activities and multi-tasking in dialogue systems.
Traitement Automatique des Langues (TAL), 43(2):131-154.
Special Issue on Dialogue.

Lochbaum
2#2
2000

Karen Lochbaum, Babrbara Grosz, and Candace Sidner.
2000.
Discourse structure and intention recognition.
In Handbook of Natural Language Processing, pages 123-146. Marcel Dekker, New York.

Lochbaum1998

Karen Lochbaum.
1998.
A collaborative planning model of intentional structure.
Computational Linguistics, 24(4):525-572.
http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/J/J98/J98-4001.pdf.

Martinovski and Traum2003

Bilyana Martinovski and David Traum.
2003.
Breakdown in human-machine interaction: the error is the clue.
In Proceedings of the ISCA tutorial and research workshop on Error handling in dialogue systems, pages 11-16, August.
http://www.ict.usc.edu/~traum/Papers/martinovsky-error.pdf.

Matheson
2#2
2000

Colin Matheson, David R. Traum, and Massimo Poesio.
2000.
Modelling grounding and discourse obligations using update rules.
In Proceedings of the 1st Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics(NAACL), april.

McTear1998

Michael McTear.
1998.
Modelling spoken dialogues with state transition diagrams: Experiences with the CSLU toolkit.
In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Sydney, Australia.
http://cslu.cse.ogi.edu/toolkit/pubs/pdf/mctear_ICSLP_98.pdf.

McTear2002

Michael McTear.
2002.
Spoken dialogue technology: enabling the conversational user interface.
ACM Computing Surveys, 34(1):99-169, March.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/505282.505285.

Nakano
2#2
2003

Y. Nakano, G. Reinstein, T. Stocky, and J. Cassell.
2003.
Towards a model of face-to-face grounding.
In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Sapporo, Japan, July 7-12. ACL.
http://www.mit.edu/~t_stocky/pubs/Nakano.Reinstein.Stocky.Cassell_ACL03.pdf.

Pfleger
2#2
2003

Norbert Pfleger, Ralf Engel, and Jan Alexandersson.
2003.
Robust multimodal discourse processing.
In Kruijff-Korbayová and Kosny [Kruijff-Korbayová and Kosny2003], pages 107-115.
https://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/diabruck/submission_finals/papers/158/paper_158.ps.

Poesio and Traum1997

Massimo Poesio and David R. Traum.
1997.
Conversational actions and discourse situations.
Computational Intelligence, 13(3):309-347.
Also appears as Research paper HCRC/RP-92, HCRC University of Edinburgh. http://www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/~poesio/publications/CI_journal.ps.gz.

Poesio and Traum1998

Massimo Poesio and David R. Traum.
1998.
Towards an axiomatization of dialogue acts.
In Joris Hulstijn and Anton Nijholt, editors, Proceedings of the Twente Workshop on the Formal Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogues (13th Twente Workshop on Language Technology), pages 207-222, Enschede, May.
http://www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/~poesio/publications/twente.ps.

Pollack1992

Martha E. Pollack.
1992.
The uses of plans.
Artificial Intelligence, 57(1):43-68.

Purver and Fernandéz2003

Matthew Purver and Raquel Fernandéz.
2003.
Utterances as update instructions.
In Kruijff-Korbayová and Kosny [Kruijff-Korbayová and Kosny2003], pages 115-123.
https://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/diabruck/submission_finals/papers/125/paper_125.ps.

Rich
2#2
2001

Charles Rich, Candance L. Sidner, and Neal Lesh.
2001.
COLLAGEN: Applying collaborative discourse theory to human-computer interaction.
AI Magazine, 22(4):15-25.
Also available as MERL Tech Report TR-2000-38. http://www.merl.com/papers/docs/TR2000-38.pdf.

Rickel
2#2
2002

J. Rickel, N.B. Lesh, C. Rich, C.L. Sidner, and A. Gertner.
2002.
Collaborative discourse theory as a foundation for tutorial dialogue.
In ITS-2002 [ITS2002], pages 542-551.

Rosé
2#2
2001

Caroly Rosé, Johanna D. Moore, Kurt VanLehn, and David Allbritton.
2001.
A comparative evaluation of socratic versus didactic tutoring.
In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, August.
http://www.hcrc.ed.ac.uk/cogsci2001/pdf-files/0869.pdf.

Schlangen and Lascarides2003

David Schlangen and Alex Lascarides.
2003.
The interpretation of non-sentential utterances in dialogue.
In Proceedings of the 4th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, Sapporo, Japan, July. Association for Computational Linguistics.
http://www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/~das/papers/sigdial.pdf.

Sidner
2#2
2003

Candace L. Sidner, Christopher Lee, and Neal Lesh.
2003.
Engagement by looking: Behaviors for robots when collaborating with people.
In Kruijff-Korbayová and Kosny [Kruijff-Korbayová and Kosny2003], pages 123-130.

Sidner1994

Candance L. Sidner.
1994.
An arificial discourse language for collaborative negotiation.
In Barbara Hayes-Roth and Richard Korf, editors, Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 814-819, Menlo Park, California.

Smith1996

Ronnie W. Smith.
1996.
Initiative-dependent features of human-computer dialogs in a task-assistance domain.
In Proceedings of the Energy Information Management Conference, pages 41-48.

Stone2003

Matthew Stone.
2003.
Communicative intentions and conversational processes in human-human and human-computer dialogue.
In John Trueswell and Michael Tanenhaus, editors, World-Situated Language Use. The MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

Strayer and Heeman2001

Susan E. Strayer and Peter A. Heeman.
2001.
Reconciling initiative and discourse structure.
In Proceedings of the SIGdial workshop.
http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/W/W01/W01-1621.pdf.

Ström and Seneff2000

N. Ström and S. Seneff.
2000.
Intelligent barge-in in conversational systems.
In Proc. 6th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Beijing, China, October.
http://www.sls.lcs.mit.edu/sls/publications/2000/03082.pdf.

Traum and Allen1994

David R Traum and James F. Allen.
1994.
Discourse obligations in dialogue processing.
In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-94), pages 1-8, June.

Traum and Larsson2003

David R. Traum and Staffan Larsson.
2003.
The information state approach to dialogue management.
In Jan van Kuppevelt and Ronnie Smith, editors, Current and New Directions in Discourse and Dialogue. Kluwer.
http://www.ict.usc.edu/~traum/Papers/traumlarsson.pdf.

Traum and Rickel2002

David Traum and Jeff Rickel.
2002.
Embodied agents for multi-party dialogue in immersive virtual world.
In Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems (AAMAS 2002), pages 766-773, July.
http://www.ict.usc.edu/~traum/Papers/traum-aamas2002.pdf.

Traum
2#2
1999

David Traum, Johan Bos, Robin Cooper, Staffan Larsson, Ian Lewin, Collin Matheson, and Massimo Poesio.
1999.
A model of dialogue moves and information state revision.
Technical Report TRINDI project deliverable D2.1, University of Gothenburg.
http://www.ling.gu.se/projekt/trindi//publications.html.

Traum
2#2
2000

David Traum, Peter Bohlin, Johan Bos, Stina Eriksson, Staffan Larsson, Ian Lewin, Collin Matheson, and David Milward.
2000.
Dialogue dynamics and levels of interaction.
TRINDI project deliverable D3.1, University of Gothenburg.
http://www.ling.gu.se/projekt/trindi//publications.html.

Traum1999

David R. Traum.
1999.
Speech acts for dialogue agents.
Foundations of Rational Agency, pages 169-201.

Zinn
2#2
2002

Klaus Zinn, Johanna Moore, and Marc Core.
2002.
A 3-tier planning architecture for managing tutorial dialogue.
In ITS-2002 [ITS2002], pages 574-584.
http://link.springer.de/link/service/series/0558/bibs/2363/23630574.htm.