<< Prev | - Up - |
Summing up the virtues of
-calculus for semantic construction.
Let's sum up what we have achieved. Our decision to move to the disciplined approach of the -calculus was sensible. For a start, we don't need to spend any time thinking about how to combine two semantic representations - functional application and
-conversion give us a general mechanism for doing so. Moreover, much of the real work is now being done at the lexical level; indeed, even the bothersome problem of finding a decent way of handling NP representations uniformly now has a simple lexical solution.
What's next?
For the remainder of this lecture, the following version of the three tasks listed earlier will be put into practise:
Specify a DCG for the fragment of natural language of interest.
Specify semantic representations for the lexical items with the help of the -calculus.
Specify the translation of a syntactic item
whose parts are
and
with the help of functional application. That is, specify which of the subparts is to be thought of as functor (here it's
), which as argument (here it's
) and then define
to be
, where
is the translation of
and
is the translation of
. Finally, apply
-conversion as a post-processing step.
<< Prev | - Up - |