Jan 12 ====== Strand:1999 ----------- Page 87: Strand mentioned "culture-specific conventions about habitual postures of the voice and vocal tract for different genders". What do they entail? How can they be clearly distinguished from other gender-specific acoustic differences? Page 91: During Strand and Johnson's (1996) experiment, wouldn't the gender-related crossing of faces and voices elicit a significant amount of confusion, with listeners considering the faces as unsuitable for the respective voices? Page 94: Is it possible to minimize the effects of stereotypes on reality perception? Strand and Johnson briefly talk about how the link between facial features and gender stereotypes is culturally specific -- if the cultural expectations are swapped (i.e. features associated with women instead associated with men), could/would this result in a different outcome? What would a pre-test look like for seeing if the synthesized stimuli of shod and sod were accepted by naive listeners as sounding like naturally produced speech? (was that necessary for this study?) I'm surprised that previous theories of speech perception didn't consider listener's social expectations, since it seems to be a prevalent factor in speech perception (and social expectations/stereotypes take place via perception of people over time). In the study by Strand and Johnson (1996), before the auditory stimuli were constructed, listeners had to judge 37 voices based on gender prototypicality. I wonder what the relationship is between vocal tract length and judged prototypicality. Since body height is correlated with vocal tract length, it would be interesting to know whether the most prototypically male sounding voice also has the longest vowel tract/ is the tallest person and vice versa. What I found remarkable was that children acquire specific gendered pronunciations very early in the process of language acquisition. How do gender stereotypes influence the perception of speech, specifically focusing on the case of fricatives /s/ and /S/? What are the implications of these findings for models of speech perception, cognition, and the relationship between the physical and social environment?